Advising Clients Who Feed Raw Diets to Pets
Rebecca L. Remillard, PhD, DVM, Diplomate ACVN
Food safety and nutritional integrity of raw meat or eggs are two important health issues that should concern veterinarians with clients who feed these items to the family pet. This article addresses food safety, because it is the more immediate health threat.
Food is contaminated with microbes. Meat from healthy animals becomes contaminated at slaughter. Meat surfaces become infected with microorganisms associated with food poisoning during handling, packaging, processing, storage, and transportation. Approximately one third of the poultry sold for human consumption has tested positive for Salmonella. Disinfected grade A eggs that caused salmonellosis were determined to have been contaminated during ovulation; as a result, they were contaminated with the bacteria before formation of the shell. Although many procedures have been incorporated into food processing procedures for both the meat and poultry industries to reduce the level of contamination, bacteria persist: All products should be considered contaminated. Raw-meat diets have been used by such industries as zoos, mink farms, and dog racing facilities; the FDA presumes these users are aware of the risks.
Thus, we should be concerned about pet owners who feed raw diets to their pets. Such diets have been documented to contain pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica 4/O:3, Salmonella species, andEscherichia coli O157:H7. Commercial raw products, sold frozen or freeze-dried, carry no claim to be pathogen-free; in fact, recent work strongly suggests that they are contaminated. Twenty-one commercially available raw-meat diets (beef, lamb, chicken, and turkey) cultured over a 4-month period were all positive for E. coli, and 10 were positive for S. enterica. The FDA now has guidelines for companies selling such products to pet owners.
Because most pathogenic organisms are found on the surface of the meat, searing the surface would significantly reduce the potential bacterial load. An option for pet owners who do not want to feed thoroughly cooked meat is to feed whole (not ground) meat, braise the surface, and feed the meat rare instead.
Pets fed contaminated raw meat shed viable organisms in feces. Evidence validates this public health risk. Salmonella was isolated from 80% of the BARF (i.e., bones and raw food) diets sampled and from 30% of the stools from dogs consuming those diets. Greyhounds and sled dogs fed raw-meat diets have been documented to shed the same subspecies of Salmonella in their feces as that found in their diets. Serovars of Campylobacter species isolated from the diarrhea of dogs was the same as that isolated from the poultry carcasses consumed by the dogs. Only 36% of healthy dogs and 17% of healthy cats harbor low levels of pathogenic salmonellae, which refutes the notion that most household pets are “naturally” infected with these species.
Individuals who clean the cat’s litter box or pick up their dog’s stool should consider the feces contaminated with viable pathogenic microbes. Extra precautions should be taken when persons or pets in the household have immune-suppressive diseases, such as human immunodeficiency virus infection, feline leukemia, or feline immunodeficiency virus infection; are undergoing chemotherapy; or are using antiinflammatory medications. Extra caution should also be exerted in households with young children to prevent fecal-oral contamination.
Handling Raw Diets
Feeding infected raw diets increases the risk for infection of both human and animal household members. Humans can become infected with food-borne pathogens when handling contaminated meat and egg products. Household transmission of food-borne pathogenic organisms from dogs to humans has been documented.
Veterinarians are trained in zoonotic diseases and thus have a responsibility to inform owners who feed raw meat or eggs of these potential health dangers. Safe practices during handling of the food, feeding dish, and feces should be emphasized, and the need for good personal hygiene must be reinforced. Veterinarians who recommend feeding raw meat or eggs without giving full disclosure of the risks and precautions may face legal ramifications. Salmonella, E. coli, andCampylobacter infection in humans are notifiable diseases, and physicians are required to report cases to local health departments.
Dispelling the Myths
The morphologic and pathophysiologic characteristics of the gastrointestinal systems of dogs, cats, and humans are remarkably similar. Many who advocate feeding raw diets contend that dogs and cats have a more acid stomach and shorter gastrointestinal tracts than do humans, protecting them from pathogenic bacteria. However, there is no difference among these species in regard to gastric pH and no evidence to suggest the difference in length of the gastrointestinal tract is protective to dogs and cats. All three species manifest similar clinical signs after ingesting food contaminated with pathogens. The severity of these signs is related to the dose of microbes or toxin ingested as well as the condition of the host.
Food Poisoning Frequency
Frequency of food poisoning in pets is difficult to determine. Veterinarians presented with a family pet for intermittent episodes of vomiting or diarrhea would treat the case symptomatically and are unlikely to send samples for bacterial culture and polymerase chain reaction identification. Hence, most if not all cases of food poisoning in the family pet are not reported because of a low level of suspicion and financial constraints.
Raw-meat advocates do not deny but downplay the potential health risks. No scientific evidence exists that a raw diet is superior to any dry or canned pet food. As a result, this practice is associated with health risks to pet and family with no demonstrable benefit.
Raw Diets • Rebecca L. Remillard
An inter-familial outbreak of Yersinia entercolitica enteritis. Gutman L, Ottesen E, Quan T, et al. N Engl J Med 288:1372-1377, 1973.
Application of polymerase chain reaction for the correlation of Salmonella serovars recovered from greyhound feces with their diet. Stone GG, Chengappa MM, Oberst RD, et al. J Vet Diagn Invest 5:378-385, 1993.
Preliminary assessment of the risk of Salmonella infection in dogs fed raw chicken diets.Joffe DJ, Schlesinger DP. Can Vet J 43:441-442, 2002.
Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and Salmonella serovars in retail chicken, turkey, pork, and beef from the greater Washington, D.C., area. Zhao C, Ge B, de Villena J, et al. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5431-5436, 2001.
Public health concerns associated with feeding raw meat diets to dogs. Lejeune JT, Hancock DD. JAVMA 219:1222-1225, 2001.
Salmonella shedding in racing sled dogs. Cantor GH, Nelson S, Vanek JA, et al.
J Diagn Invest 9:447-448, 1997.
The legal implications of the veterinarian’s role as a private practitioner and health professional, with particular reference to the human-animal bond: Part 2, the veterinarian’s role in society. Jack DC. Can Vet J 38:653-659, 1997.
Transmission of Yersinia enterocolitica 4/O:3 to pets via contaminated pork. Fredriksson-Ahomaa M, Korte T, Korkeala H. Lett Appl Microbiol 32:375-378, 2001.
Bad Bug Book. FDA. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/intro.html
Manufacture and labeling of raw meat foods for companion and captive noncompanion carnivores and omnivores. FDA. http://www.fda.gov/cvm/